Trump Plans to Shift Billions in Anti-Terror Funds from Democratic to Republican States

President Trump speaks with guests at a rose garden dinner
President Trump speaks with guests at a rose garden dinner. (Photo: White House)

The Trump administration’s new homeland security plan would cut anti-terror grants to Democratic states by up to 70%, redirecting funds to Trump-voting states. The plan is igniting political and legal controversy, with Democratic-led states accusing the White House of using national security dollars as a political weapon.

A Radical Funding Shift

The administration has unveiled a plan to restructure the federal anti-terrorism grant program, which was created after the September 11 attacks to strengthen homeland security at the state and local levels. The new formula would divert billions away from Democratic-controlled states — including California, Illinois, New Jersey, and Washington, D.C. — and funnel much of that funding toward Republican-led states that supported Trump in the 2024 election.

Some states could lose as much as 70 percent of their current allocations under the revised framework, according to federal budget documents reviewed by The Guardian. The Department of Homeland Security has defended the overhaul as a “risk-informed adjustment” aimed at addressing modern threats such as border violence and transnational crime.

Critics Say It’s Political Retaliation

Democratic officials and national security experts have blasted the move as partisan punishment masquerading as reform. “This isn’t about risk,” one state security director said. “It’s about retribution.”

Twelve Democratic-led states have already filed a joint lawsuit seeking to block the rule, arguing it violates both the Constitution and long-standing federal statutes governing the use of national security funds. A federal judge in Rhode Island has temporarily halted the redistribution while the case moves forward.

The Bigger Picture

The proposal comes at a time when federal-state tensions are already high over shutdown politics, immigration enforcement, and federal law enforcement priorities. Analysts warn that this funding shift could deepen partisan divides within America’s security apparatus — and set a dangerous precedent where **“who you vote for” determines **how much federal protection you get.

The Author

Picture of Ellis Grant

Ellis Grant

Staff Writer, Readovia

Sponsored

Travelocity

Low rates on hotels – guaranteed.

Secure Your Website

You’re one click away from safer. Get upgrades that shield your WordPress site 24/7.

More Politics